h1bdude1
05-27 05:47 PM
I am not here to give somebody red or green dots.
I am simply asking my questions bcoz i am little nervous before taking this step. so taking little advice from other people.
thanks
h1bdude1
I am simply asking my questions bcoz i am little nervous before taking this step. so taking little advice from other people.
thanks
h1bdude1
wallpaper cher lloyd 2011 tattoos. cher lloyd 2011 tattoos; cher lloyd 2011 tattoos
sai
02-25 05:33 PM
http://www.immigration-law.com/
Unfortunately, the Senator dropped from S. 1932 the provision on availability of I-485 filings for employment-based immigrants during the period of retrogression. We urge the Senator to reinstate this provision in the final draft of his bill before it is introduced to the Senate Judiciary Committee. Community leaders, please urgently contact the Senator's office to urge him to reinstate this provision.
Unfortunately, the Senator dropped from S. 1932 the provision on availability of I-485 filings for employment-based immigrants during the period of retrogression. We urge the Senator to reinstate this provision in the final draft of his bill before it is introduced to the Senate Judiciary Committee. Community leaders, please urgently contact the Senator's office to urge him to reinstate this provision.
eb3_nepa
06-11 01:16 PM
HI Guys,
I recently received my I-140 approval (premium) and i was recapturing my PD of June 10 2003. The STRANGE thing is that this time i see an "A" number above my name in the Beneficiary column.
More importantly last time when the I140 approval came along, it said CLEARLY that I could not apply for my 485. This time it says I am eligible and that I should contact the local INS office.
HAS ANYONE had a similar experience and does the A number mean the "immigrant visa number" by ANY chance??
I recently received my I-140 approval (premium) and i was recapturing my PD of June 10 2003. The STRANGE thing is that this time i see an "A" number above my name in the Beneficiary column.
More importantly last time when the I140 approval came along, it said CLEARLY that I could not apply for my 485. This time it says I am eligible and that I should contact the local INS office.
HAS ANYONE had a similar experience and does the A number mean the "immigrant visa number" by ANY chance??
2011 cher lloyd 2011 tattoos.
krishmunn
08-29 07:55 AM
krishmunn: Could you please share your experience? what really when you traveled in scenario described above? thanks!
Did not have any problem. Got I-94 per my new 797 (3 year). However, somehow the officer issued I-94 for one less day (i.e. one day less then the end date in my 797). When I asked he said his computer shows like that. I did not argue just for one day.
Did not have any problem. Got I-94 per my new 797 (3 year). However, somehow the officer issued I-94 for one less day (i.e. one day less then the end date in my 797). When I asked he said his computer shows like that. I did not argue just for one day.
more...
pandu_hawaldar
06-03 12:39 PM
lazycis: I liked your signature..its true...:D
singhsa3
05-09 03:15 PM
***********Look my message down below*********************
Folks,
It is very important that the people with later priority dates for example 2007 or later for EB2 India and 2003 or later for EB3 India, assume leadership roles in IV state chapters. Currently, it is mainly the people with earlier priority dates who are active and they now after very long wait have started getting their green cards.
We don't want others to go through the same long wait and want to continue the movement by passing on the torch to the people with later PDs. These people should consider themselves lucky as they have an excellent forum to organize themselves. For most others, there was none existed, when they started their immigration journey.
You must all realize and appreciate that people have other priorities in life, work and family related. As they get their green cards they refocus to leading a Normal life and rightly so. Thus, it is upto the affected people to take charge now!. If you don't do it , this movement will die and your wait will become endless.
Just in case you are wondering , my PD is Nov 2005 EB2. And personally, I intend to become inactive the day I will get my green card and refocus my effort on another volunteer activity related to Hydrogen Fuel promotion.
I hope the message is clear!
Folks,
It is very important that the people with later priority dates for example 2007 or later for EB2 India and 2003 or later for EB3 India, assume leadership roles in IV state chapters. Currently, it is mainly the people with earlier priority dates who are active and they now after very long wait have started getting their green cards.
We don't want others to go through the same long wait and want to continue the movement by passing on the torch to the people with later PDs. These people should consider themselves lucky as they have an excellent forum to organize themselves. For most others, there was none existed, when they started their immigration journey.
You must all realize and appreciate that people have other priorities in life, work and family related. As they get their green cards they refocus to leading a Normal life and rightly so. Thus, it is upto the affected people to take charge now!. If you don't do it , this movement will die and your wait will become endless.
Just in case you are wondering , my PD is Nov 2005 EB2. And personally, I intend to become inactive the day I will get my green card and refocus my effort on another volunteer activity related to Hydrogen Fuel promotion.
I hope the message is clear!
more...
brainpower1
02-02 10:49 AM
Did you enclose the original H-4 I-94 along with the I-539.
What happens if the COS is denied, will USCIS return the I-94.
My wife did a successful transfer from H4-F1 in her last semester and is now preparing to apply for her OPT. The university designated officials reviewed all her paperwork.
We submitted bank statements as a financial proof as a proof to cover first year expenses. The F1 was approved in 6 weeks.
What happens if the COS is denied, will USCIS return the I-94.
My wife did a successful transfer from H4-F1 in her last semester and is now preparing to apply for her OPT. The university designated officials reviewed all her paperwork.
We submitted bank statements as a financial proof as a proof to cover first year expenses. The F1 was approved in 6 weeks.
2010 Cher Lloyd#39;s birthday is on
zCool
05-08 05:15 PM
Let me be first one here to speak on behalf of that unborn child!
First, even in best of the cases, travel so late in term is not preferred!
Secondly, primary reason behind these trips generally is to get support from parents, luckily(just from support POV) your husband is at home, he can help around, you are living in best country to have kid in, At worst, get a temperory insurance if you don't have one currently..
Another point to see is, lets say baby is born in India, Since you've applied for GC here, and chances are you will get in next couple of yrs. so if you've made your mind to settle here, won't it be in the best interests of your child to be natural born native??
And most importantly, since both of you are on EAD (or on h1 without recent paystubs which is even worse) you are inviting world of headache should you end up delivering in India..
So all in all.. once again.. if you want to go.. go sooner and come back sooner.. to minimize your chances of delivery in India..
First, even in best of the cases, travel so late in term is not preferred!
Secondly, primary reason behind these trips generally is to get support from parents, luckily(just from support POV) your husband is at home, he can help around, you are living in best country to have kid in, At worst, get a temperory insurance if you don't have one currently..
Another point to see is, lets say baby is born in India, Since you've applied for GC here, and chances are you will get in next couple of yrs. so if you've made your mind to settle here, won't it be in the best interests of your child to be natural born native??
And most importantly, since both of you are on EAD (or on h1 without recent paystubs which is even worse) you are inviting world of headache should you end up delivering in India..
So all in all.. once again.. if you want to go.. go sooner and come back sooner.. to minimize your chances of delivery in India..
more...
yabadaba
07-09 12:18 PM
softwarreguy... good job.. hits all bullet points perfectly.
hair +tour+2011+cher+lloyd
anilsal
01-16 01:03 AM
and websites. We do not have enough time. Guys, please do the needful.
http://anilgeneral.blogspot.com
http://anilgeneral.blogspot.com
more...
csvinay
07-14 06:24 PM
Great points.
I think we should also make placards addressing the plight of immigrant's family to highlight some of the family issues because of USCIS flip-flop.
btw, I love the term flip-flop to address our issue. It has such a negative connotation after 2004 election. I think someone used it in July bulletin thread and journalists were quick to latch on to it. We should use more of it in placards and when talking to reporters.
Another words I like is "Limbo" :)
I think we should also make placards addressing the plight of immigrant's family to highlight some of the family issues because of USCIS flip-flop.
btw, I love the term flip-flop to address our issue. It has such a negative connotation after 2004 election. I think someone used it in July bulletin thread and journalists were quick to latch on to it. We should use more of it in placards and when talking to reporters.
Another words I like is "Limbo" :)
hot cher lloyd 2011 tattoos. Cher Lloyd Gets Inked
GCKaMaara
05-08 02:28 PM
June 2009 Bulletin is already old news. Lets start predicting for July 2009. I'm bored.
Don't you have X-Box or PS3? Just kidding.
Don't you have X-Box or PS3? Just kidding.
more...
house cher lloyd 2011 tattoos. Cher Lloyd Tattoo Images: Cher Lloyd Tattoo Images:
smuggymba
07-27 11:10 AM
You can file in EB3. Approvals are taking 2 months these days. Mine took 2 months. Once your PERM is approved you can file I-140 in premium which should take 2 weeks. Once you have both of these approved then you can file for H1 extentions.
I filed my perm in march, 2010; have not heard anything yet. Mine employer is in TX, filed online.
I filed my perm in march, 2010; have not heard anything yet. Mine employer is in TX, filed online.
tattoo Cher Lloyd has added an 8th
logiclife
06-28 02:01 PM
The Bond amendment is a clear indicator that legalization will never pass the senate. Not now, not next year, not in 2009, and not in 2010 or even after that. There were 41 votes in favor of keeping the Bond amendment alive. The amendment was set aside (killed) during the debate on Wednesday, but it did manage to get 41 votes in favor.
That means that 41 senators will never ever support legalization for the illegals. That means that there will never be 60 votes to support legalization of illegals. That means that filibuster will always be used by people opposing legalization of illegals.
What this means is that unless there is serious change in the composition of the Senate (pro legalization candidates getting elected and anti legalization Senators losing elections), CIR will never pass because any "Comprehensive" bill will include legalization for illegals.
AILA's description of Bond Amendment:
Bond Amendment Preventing Z Visa Holders from Getting Green Cards:
Senators Kennedy (D-MA) argued passionately against Senator Bond’s (R-MO) amendment to prohibit green cards for Z visa holders. Senator Kennedy said that this amendment strikes at the heart of the underlying bill, and flies in the face of the values that helped make the United States the great nation it is. Apart from providing a disincentive for the current undocumented population to emerge from the shadows and integrate fully into American society, the amendment, Senator Kennedy argued, also creates problems for those who do come forward. Barring Z visa holders from adjusting to legal permanent resident status essentially would create, he said, a permanent underclass of immigrants without legal rights, repeating the mistakes made in other countries. AILA opposes this amendment.
A motion to table the amendment was voted on. This motion to table was agreed to by a vote of 56-41.
That means that 41 senators will never ever support legalization for the illegals. That means that there will never be 60 votes to support legalization of illegals. That means that filibuster will always be used by people opposing legalization of illegals.
What this means is that unless there is serious change in the composition of the Senate (pro legalization candidates getting elected and anti legalization Senators losing elections), CIR will never pass because any "Comprehensive" bill will include legalization for illegals.
AILA's description of Bond Amendment:
Bond Amendment Preventing Z Visa Holders from Getting Green Cards:
Senators Kennedy (D-MA) argued passionately against Senator Bond’s (R-MO) amendment to prohibit green cards for Z visa holders. Senator Kennedy said that this amendment strikes at the heart of the underlying bill, and flies in the face of the values that helped make the United States the great nation it is. Apart from providing a disincentive for the current undocumented population to emerge from the shadows and integrate fully into American society, the amendment, Senator Kennedy argued, also creates problems for those who do come forward. Barring Z visa holders from adjusting to legal permanent resident status essentially would create, he said, a permanent underclass of immigrants without legal rights, repeating the mistakes made in other countries. AILA opposes this amendment.
A motion to table the amendment was voted on. This motion to table was agreed to by a vote of 56-41.
more...
pictures cher lloyd tattoo
sam_hoosier
05-24 04:44 PM
I will go back. Period !!
Since that is not an option, I voted for "I'll GO BACK if the bill is enacted in its current form" :D
Since that is not an option, I voted for "I'll GO BACK if the bill is enacted in its current form" :D
dresses pictures Cher Lloyd#39;s 14 Tattoos! cher lloyd 2011 tattoos. cher lloyd
starscream
06-28 04:02 PM
Tech industry has started giving its reactions and possible ways forward:
http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=200001387
Immigration Reform Bill Is Dead, H-1B Visa Debate Lives On
Industry leaders express frustration that Senate action on the immigration bill has once again stalled.
By Marianne Kolbasuk McGee
InformationWeek
Jun 28, 2007 01:30 PM
It looks like nothing will change anytime soon with the annual cap or regulations related to H-1B or L-1 visas, the temporary visas most commonly used to bring foreign-born tech workers into the U.S. Or will it?
The U.S. Senate Thursday morning failed to pass a motion that would've ended debate and allowed its comprehensive immigration reform legislation to move forward. This is the second time in about a month that the bill failed to get enough votes to move the bill forward.
Washington D.C. insiders say it's unlikely that legislators will try to revive the controversial bill another time prior to the Presidential elections in 2008.
Software & Information Industry Association president Ken Wasch said he was "profoundly disappointed" that Senate action on the immigration bill has once again stalled.
"Without this action, America's high-tech industry will be challenged to find the skilled workers it needs and therefore put at a significant disadvantage to its global competitors," Wasch said.
But while comprehensive immigration reform looks dead for now, some H-1B proponents and opponents still hold out hope that their stand-alone bills that have been introduced in recent months will resurface -- including bills that raise the cap and others that aim to crack down on H-1B employers.
The comprehensive immigration bill and its amendments included provisions to raise the current H-1B cap of 85,000 (which includes 65,000 visas plus and additional 20,000 visa exemptions for foreign students with advanced degrees from U.S. schools) to more than 115,000 and up to 180,000 annually.
However, that bill also featured anti-fraud and anti-abuse provisions that aimed to make it tougher for employers to skirt hiring Americans for IT positions. Some large U.S. based companies, including Oracle and Microsoft, had complained that those provisions would've unduly punished employers already playing by current rules.
Max Gleischman, an immigration policy advisor to Senator Richard Durbin (D-Ill) said that a standalone bi-partisan H-1B and L-1 anti-fraud bill introduced in April by Durbin and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is currently "still in the Senate judiciary committee which could bring the bill up again."
Meanwhile, technology vendors, which have been lobbying Washington policy makers for several years to raise the H-1B cap, say not all hope is dead on their side either.
Several bi-partisan bills introduced in recent months, including the SKIL bill, to raise the cap are also still potential relief for employers who say they are finding it hard to hire tech talent with very specific degrees and talent.
"As long as Congress is in session and there's a light on in Washington, we'll be making the our concerns for skilled worker relief known," said Robert Hoffman, VP for government affairs at Oracle and co-chair of Compete America, a coalition of tech companies and educators pushing for employer-based immigration reforms, including raising the H-1B cap.
"We're not putting a stop clock on ourselves," Hoffman said.
Even if a standalone bill raising the H-1B cap is unlikely to move forward prior to the presidential election in November 2008, it's possible the cap could be raised as part of an appropriation bill by the end of this year, said Hoffman. That's what happened in 2004 when Congress created the H-1B exemption for 20,000 foreign students who get advanced degrees from U.S. universities, said Hoffman.
"And that happened just before a presidential election, too" he said.
"I think it is too early to tell what will happen," in an e-mail interview with InformationWeek said Ron Hira, assistant professor of public policy on leave from Rochester Institute of Technology and research associate at the Economic Policy Institute.
"The high-skill immigration system is obviously broken and needs to be fixed," said Hira, who opposed raising the H-1B cap. "No interest group is satisfied with the current system so there will be pressure from multiple sides for some change," he said
"There are plenty of standalone bills that have been introduced -- they don't need to be re-introduced. The question is whether Congress wants to take them up and put them on the agenda," he said.
http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=200001387
Immigration Reform Bill Is Dead, H-1B Visa Debate Lives On
Industry leaders express frustration that Senate action on the immigration bill has once again stalled.
By Marianne Kolbasuk McGee
InformationWeek
Jun 28, 2007 01:30 PM
It looks like nothing will change anytime soon with the annual cap or regulations related to H-1B or L-1 visas, the temporary visas most commonly used to bring foreign-born tech workers into the U.S. Or will it?
The U.S. Senate Thursday morning failed to pass a motion that would've ended debate and allowed its comprehensive immigration reform legislation to move forward. This is the second time in about a month that the bill failed to get enough votes to move the bill forward.
Washington D.C. insiders say it's unlikely that legislators will try to revive the controversial bill another time prior to the Presidential elections in 2008.
Software & Information Industry Association president Ken Wasch said he was "profoundly disappointed" that Senate action on the immigration bill has once again stalled.
"Without this action, America's high-tech industry will be challenged to find the skilled workers it needs and therefore put at a significant disadvantage to its global competitors," Wasch said.
But while comprehensive immigration reform looks dead for now, some H-1B proponents and opponents still hold out hope that their stand-alone bills that have been introduced in recent months will resurface -- including bills that raise the cap and others that aim to crack down on H-1B employers.
The comprehensive immigration bill and its amendments included provisions to raise the current H-1B cap of 85,000 (which includes 65,000 visas plus and additional 20,000 visa exemptions for foreign students with advanced degrees from U.S. schools) to more than 115,000 and up to 180,000 annually.
However, that bill also featured anti-fraud and anti-abuse provisions that aimed to make it tougher for employers to skirt hiring Americans for IT positions. Some large U.S. based companies, including Oracle and Microsoft, had complained that those provisions would've unduly punished employers already playing by current rules.
Max Gleischman, an immigration policy advisor to Senator Richard Durbin (D-Ill) said that a standalone bi-partisan H-1B and L-1 anti-fraud bill introduced in April by Durbin and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is currently "still in the Senate judiciary committee which could bring the bill up again."
Meanwhile, technology vendors, which have been lobbying Washington policy makers for several years to raise the H-1B cap, say not all hope is dead on their side either.
Several bi-partisan bills introduced in recent months, including the SKIL bill, to raise the cap are also still potential relief for employers who say they are finding it hard to hire tech talent with very specific degrees and talent.
"As long as Congress is in session and there's a light on in Washington, we'll be making the our concerns for skilled worker relief known," said Robert Hoffman, VP for government affairs at Oracle and co-chair of Compete America, a coalition of tech companies and educators pushing for employer-based immigration reforms, including raising the H-1B cap.
"We're not putting a stop clock on ourselves," Hoffman said.
Even if a standalone bill raising the H-1B cap is unlikely to move forward prior to the presidential election in November 2008, it's possible the cap could be raised as part of an appropriation bill by the end of this year, said Hoffman. That's what happened in 2004 when Congress created the H-1B exemption for 20,000 foreign students who get advanced degrees from U.S. universities, said Hoffman.
"And that happened just before a presidential election, too" he said.
"I think it is too early to tell what will happen," in an e-mail interview with InformationWeek said Ron Hira, assistant professor of public policy on leave from Rochester Institute of Technology and research associate at the Economic Policy Institute.
"The high-skill immigration system is obviously broken and needs to be fixed," said Hira, who opposed raising the H-1B cap. "No interest group is satisfied with the current system so there will be pressure from multiple sides for some change," he said
"There are plenty of standalone bills that have been introduced -- they don't need to be re-introduced. The question is whether Congress wants to take them up and put them on the agenda," he said.
more...
makeup Cher Lloyd#39;s 14 Tattoos!
krishmunn
03-10 09:17 AM
Yes you can withdraw your 485 and file one as derivative of your spouse. Once you withdraw your 485 , your 140 should still remain valid if you need to use it (in case there is some problem with your spouse's case).
girlfriend Cher Lloyd Tattoo
perm2gc
05-18 02:00 PM
It very sad to read your story.
good luck in your fight and career.Please keep visiting IV.
good luck in your fight and career.Please keep visiting IV.
hairstyles She also had a #39;Daddy#39; tattoo
skdasbhaumik
02-08 07:59 PM
fantastic job!!! This is a great milestone and adds hope to our efforts! Lets keep up the pressure!
lazycis
02-05 10:32 AM
1. Yes, you can use EAD to work for any company.
2. H1B becomes invalid, but you can always re-validate it if you leave the US and re-enter with a new H1. You can also transfer H1 to new employer. However my advice is to use EAD and forget about H1.
3. The only way to keep H1 is to work full-time for company A and use EAD for part-time job. If you use EAD for full-time job, you invoke AC21 automatically.
2. H1B becomes invalid, but you can always re-validate it if you leave the US and re-enter with a new H1. You can also transfer H1 to new employer. However my advice is to use EAD and forget about H1.
3. The only way to keep H1 is to work full-time for company A and use EAD for part-time job. If you use EAD for full-time job, you invoke AC21 automatically.
GCBy3000
04-15 07:24 PM
Yes, I have seen people moving back to India even after getting GC. My own classmate moved backed to India inspite of having GC and got settled down with CTS.
Another relative of mine, having GC and bought 350K house in Miami, moved back to Oracle in India two years back.
Two others have also moved back during the GC process. I have couple already lined up and waiting for their turn to move back.
Most of my friends here are already well established in India. They have properties there and moreover it is cultural pressue and family pressure which makes them move back. There are some fellows who decide to stay here,but majority of them move back even after getting GC. THis is my personnal opinion with my experience with my friends.
Another relative of mine, having GC and bought 350K house in Miami, moved back to Oracle in India two years back.
Two others have also moved back during the GC process. I have couple already lined up and waiting for their turn to move back.
Most of my friends here are already well established in India. They have properties there and moreover it is cultural pressue and family pressure which makes them move back. There are some fellows who decide to stay here,but majority of them move back even after getting GC. THis is my personnal opinion with my experience with my friends.
0 comments:
Post a Comment