gc_kaavaali
01-21 01:56 AM
Congratulations!!! Enjoy the freedom
wallpaper Maria Sharapova
uma001
12-16 08:31 AM
Complicated situation.
Came to the US on H1B Visa, 3 years, 2009-2012, with valid I-94.
Got laid off, but didn't leave the country and therefore became "Out of Status".
Stayed out of status for over 1 year.
Applied for new job, got offer, prepared paperwork and applied for NEW H1B (NOT a transfer since I was out of status). Did this through sponsoring company & their attorneys.
New H1B was approved.
Now I have to leave & reentry to get a new I-94, according to the lawyer.
I've heard I might not be able to go to Canada or Mexico and have to go to my homecountry? My attorney on the other hand says all I need to do is leave&reentry without even going through a consulate, just to get a new I-94.
Just want to double check that I'm not making any mistakes by going to Mexico instead of my home country (Italy).
Thanks!
Sparta,
Not sure which profession are you in? Since you had one year gap in employment, if you go to canda or mexico, at the consultate, they may ask for paystubs for this period or W2s..My friend was out of project for 2 months , he did not have paystubs, At canada, they ask him for paystubs, he could not show and they put a query, he was in canada for two months,visa rejected and went back to India.
Also, I would like to know how did your H1 get approved without any RFEs since you did not have any pay stubs for one year. Also you were not on project. Usually USCIS ask for letter from client and latets paystub for approval of H1.
Came to the US on H1B Visa, 3 years, 2009-2012, with valid I-94.
Got laid off, but didn't leave the country and therefore became "Out of Status".
Stayed out of status for over 1 year.
Applied for new job, got offer, prepared paperwork and applied for NEW H1B (NOT a transfer since I was out of status). Did this through sponsoring company & their attorneys.
New H1B was approved.
Now I have to leave & reentry to get a new I-94, according to the lawyer.
I've heard I might not be able to go to Canada or Mexico and have to go to my homecountry? My attorney on the other hand says all I need to do is leave&reentry without even going through a consulate, just to get a new I-94.
Just want to double check that I'm not making any mistakes by going to Mexico instead of my home country (Italy).
Thanks!
Sparta,
Not sure which profession are you in? Since you had one year gap in employment, if you go to canda or mexico, at the consultate, they may ask for paystubs for this period or W2s..My friend was out of project for 2 months , he did not have paystubs, At canada, they ask him for paystubs, he could not show and they put a query, he was in canada for two months,visa rejected and went back to India.
Also, I would like to know how did your H1 get approved without any RFEs since you did not have any pay stubs for one year. Also you were not on project. Usually USCIS ask for letter from client and latets paystub for approval of H1.
perm2gc
06-14 05:42 PM
I'm in the similar situation, but in my case my wife and son are already in India and they were supposed to return on july 28th. Is it possible to add them later to my I-485 after they returned? or, pre-pone their reurn schedule a week ahead will solve the issue, please advise!
The dates should be current to add them to your 485 application.your best bet is to cut short the visit and fly them back ASAP.
The dates should be current to add them to your 485 application.your best bet is to cut short the visit and fly them back ASAP.
2011 maria sharapova: maria
FinalGC
08-27 09:09 AM
Does this answer have any correlation with the "new job" offer.
Question 14. Must the alien have a new offer of employment at the time the I-485 is being
adjudicated under the I-140 portability provisions?
Answer: Yes. The alien cannot still be looking for ?same or similar? employment at the time the I-485 is being adjudicated under the adjustment portability provisions. The alien must be able to show there is a new valid offer of employment at the time the I-485 is adjudicated.
Question 14. Must the alien have a new offer of employment at the time the I-485 is being
adjudicated under the I-140 portability provisions?
Answer: Yes. The alien cannot still be looking for ?same or similar? employment at the time the I-485 is being adjudicated under the adjustment portability provisions. The alien must be able to show there is a new valid offer of employment at the time the I-485 is adjudicated.
more...
new_horizon
10-13 04:24 PM
these one-time contributions are good. But I suggest the members should be encouraged to make regular monthly contributions, even as low as $25 a month. It's doable...just the cost of dining out with your family one time. that way the activities of IV can be planned much in advance, and it would lessen the anxiety of iv core.
just a suggestion, it might help the folks to contribute monthly if some of the activities are highlighted by core, so that the folks know how their monies are used. I know there are some issues to it, but a general info would help.
just a suggestion, it might help the folks to contribute monthly if some of the activities are highlighted by core, so that the folks know how their monies are used. I know there are some issues to it, but a general info would help.
walking_dude
12-14 01:34 PM
Highly-skilled immigrants also post poetry and contribute to American literature :)
more...
Pagal
09-28 09:31 AM
This is indeed a step in the right direction ... its a win-win situation for both countries as well...
2010 Maria Sharapova sexy hot pics
claudia255
09-21 06:30 PM
I hope someone from IV Core reads this thread. We shouldn't wait until next week to decide what to do about this. It might be the last chance we have for Congress to consider any legislation regarding employement based visas this year.
more...
pandu_hawaldar
06-03 11:37 AM
It is called soft LUD, which happens most of times, when there is no real change in the wording inside that link but still you can see a new date. It may happen sometimes when they reindex or restructure or something in their file/database system. An LUD does not always carry description change in your case/file. I hope this helps.
Okay I registered online. It shows my I-485 application was last changed on 01/04/2008. How do I see what was changed, as when I click on that line it takes me to the page where it describes when my application was received in August'2007 etc etc... doesn't mention anything about changes done on 01/04/2008 .
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/caseStatusSearchDisplay.do;jsessionid=acb6HRI66YiE YcZ2E7oPr
Okay I registered online. It shows my I-485 application was last changed on 01/04/2008. How do I see what was changed, as when I click on that line it takes me to the page where it describes when my application was received in August'2007 etc etc... doesn't mention anything about changes done on 01/04/2008 .
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/caseStatusSearchDisplay.do;jsessionid=acb6HRI66YiE YcZ2E7oPr
hair maria sharapova hot shoess.
bhagat69
04-24 09:55 AM
Friends, if I already have an EB3 application pending for April 2006 PD and my friend is willing to file EB2 application while I continue to work on EB3 with present employer will my current employer find out ?
My current employer has refused to give me copy of I-140. I only know the receipt# LIN... for my I-140. Can I use this to port my priority date from EB3 to EB2. I want to be able to port my dates and file a new EB2 labour without my current employer finding out - possible or not ??
In my case will the EB2 filed now take longer than EB3 filed in April 2006 priority date ? Is it even worth it ?
My current employer has refused to give me copy of I-140. I only know the receipt# LIN... for my I-140. Can I use this to port my priority date from EB3 to EB2. I want to be able to port my dates and file a new EB2 labour without my current employer finding out - possible or not ??
In my case will the EB2 filed now take longer than EB3 filed in April 2006 priority date ? Is it even worth it ?
more...
xyzgc
10-10 02:08 PM
every few weeks one new person comes up with the same idea as if it hasn't occurred to any one before, fancying themselves in the lines of Erin Brokovich.
Then a bunch of people join them, for few days the thread will be on the top with every body blowing steam on how USCIS should be taught a lesson. Then the thread disappears and wait for few weeks. A new one pops up.
It's almost as if it is a passing ritual for new IV members.
very true, some people will believe anything, like Germans thought they could kidnap Churchill and thereby swing the outcome of the world war 2, when they were losing war on every front!
Then a bunch of people join them, for few days the thread will be on the top with every body blowing steam on how USCIS should be taught a lesson. Then the thread disappears and wait for few weeks. A new one pops up.
It's almost as if it is a passing ritual for new IV members.
very true, some people will believe anything, like Germans thought they could kidnap Churchill and thereby swing the outcome of the world war 2, when they were losing war on every front!
hot Maria Sharapova
vivekm1309
02-10 08:05 PM
Let's say I switch to another employer using AC21 while waiting for I-485 approval. Then, I-485 is denied due to a simple reason like insufficient funds. Do I have to go through the GC process all over again, or can I just fix the problem and re-file I-485 using the old priority date?
thx,
As per my company lawyer 485 cannot be denied on insufficent funds/ability to pay etc ..this check is made at I-140 stage.
As per him 485 can be denied for health reasons, criminal background reasons or non compatibility of current job with the labor details...does anyone have a different opinion?
thx,
As per my company lawyer 485 cannot be denied on insufficent funds/ability to pay etc ..this check is made at I-140 stage.
As per him 485 can be denied for health reasons, criminal background reasons or non compatibility of current job with the labor details...does anyone have a different opinion?
more...
house Maria Sharapova hot thighs
lostinbeta
10-03 02:22 AM
0) <~~OW MY EYE :crazy:
tattoo Maria Sharapova Sexy Pics, Hot
justAnotherFile
09-05 03:25 PM
My birth certificate issued by the city municipality in India does not carry my name. Is a affidavit required in such a case? Has anyone been through this before? Also can you post an sample affidavit if you have one.
thx
thx
more...
pictures Maria Sharapova Hot Cleavage
webm
06-13 03:33 PM
How do I postpone the FP cause I will be out of time on that day?
Call the CIS customer service and you can reschedule FP appointment as it says on the notice..
Call the CIS customer service and you can reschedule FP appointment as it says on the notice..
dresses 2000+ new Maria Sharapova
obelix
08-21 04:51 PM
Mine PP I-140 reached USCIS on 29th June. I got a RFE on 5th July. Lawyer replied RFE sometime 6th of Aug and got the case approved on 13 August. So the bottom line is that my case was always treated as Premium case. Hope this helps.
Good for you. So looks like they accepted a few and sent back a few. I hope they will upgrade it to premium - at least that is what my lawyer says.
Good for you. So looks like they accepted a few and sent back a few. I hope they will upgrade it to premium - at least that is what my lawyer says.
more...
makeup Tennis ace Maria Sharapova hot
dealsnet
05-13 12:58 PM
I have heard a refund being made for telephone.
This may be because of that.
IRS Announces Standard Amounts for Telephone Tax Refunds
WASHINGTON ? The Internal Revenue Service today announced the standard amounts that most long-distance customers can use to figure their telephone tax refund. These amounts, which range from $30 to $60, will enable millions of individual taxpayers to request the telephone tax refund without having to dig through old phone bills.
In general, anyone who paid the long-distance telephone tax will get the refund on their 2006 federal income tax return. This includes individuals, businesses and nonprofit organizations. The 2006 return is usually filed during 2007.
The standard amounts are based on the total number of exemptions claimed on the 2006 federal income tax return. The standard amounts are $30 for a person filing a return with one exemption, $40 for two exemptions, $50 for three exemptions and $60 for four or more exemptions. For example, a married couple filing a joint return with two dependent children (for a total of four exemptions) will be eligible for the maximum standard amount of $60.
?The easiest way for eligible taxpayers to get their money back is to use the standard amounts,? said IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson. ?These amounts save taxpayers from locating 41 months of old phone bills and analyzing these bills to determine the taxes paid. We believe the standard amounts are both reasonable and fair.?
To get the standard amount, eligible taxpayers only need to fill out one additional line on their regular 2006 return. The IRS is creating a special short form (Form 1040EZ-T) for those who don?t need to file a regular return.
The standard amounts are based on actual telephone usage data, and the standard amount applicable to a family or other household reflects the long-distance phone tax paid by similarly sized families or households. Those who paid the long-distance tax on service billed after Feb. 28, 2003 and before Aug. 1, 2006 are eligible for a refund.
Only individuals can use the standard amounts. Alternatively, individual taxpayers can choose to figure their refund using the actual amount of tax paid.
This may be because of that.
IRS Announces Standard Amounts for Telephone Tax Refunds
WASHINGTON ? The Internal Revenue Service today announced the standard amounts that most long-distance customers can use to figure their telephone tax refund. These amounts, which range from $30 to $60, will enable millions of individual taxpayers to request the telephone tax refund without having to dig through old phone bills.
In general, anyone who paid the long-distance telephone tax will get the refund on their 2006 federal income tax return. This includes individuals, businesses and nonprofit organizations. The 2006 return is usually filed during 2007.
The standard amounts are based on the total number of exemptions claimed on the 2006 federal income tax return. The standard amounts are $30 for a person filing a return with one exemption, $40 for two exemptions, $50 for three exemptions and $60 for four or more exemptions. For example, a married couple filing a joint return with two dependent children (for a total of four exemptions) will be eligible for the maximum standard amount of $60.
?The easiest way for eligible taxpayers to get their money back is to use the standard amounts,? said IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson. ?These amounts save taxpayers from locating 41 months of old phone bills and analyzing these bills to determine the taxes paid. We believe the standard amounts are both reasonable and fair.?
To get the standard amount, eligible taxpayers only need to fill out one additional line on their regular 2006 return. The IRS is creating a special short form (Form 1040EZ-T) for those who don?t need to file a regular return.
The standard amounts are based on actual telephone usage data, and the standard amount applicable to a family or other household reflects the long-distance phone tax paid by similarly sized families or households. Those who paid the long-distance tax on service billed after Feb. 28, 2003 and before Aug. 1, 2006 are eligible for a refund.
Only individuals can use the standard amounts. Alternatively, individual taxpayers can choose to figure their refund using the actual amount of tax paid.
girlfriend maria sharapova hot
elaiyam
04-28 02:45 PM
Well he could not get visa stamping and was rejected. The VO said he can not issue a visitor visa to a young guy (24 yr old) -
I am still to get more details from him about the interview.
Any suggestions? Shall he re-apply or it is of no use? He at some point of time in future might need to come to US on work visa (no one knows when) so will rejection of Visitor Visa have any negative impact in future??
Do not have to worry abt the future. It will not be an issue. My first visitor visa vas rejected, and i was able to receive my h1 stamping (three times) without any problem (offcourse i mentioned in the visa application about my prior visa rejection).
I am still to get more details from him about the interview.
Any suggestions? Shall he re-apply or it is of no use? He at some point of time in future might need to come to US on work visa (no one knows when) so will rejection of Visitor Visa have any negative impact in future??
Do not have to worry abt the future. It will not be an issue. My first visitor visa vas rejected, and i was able to receive my h1 stamping (three times) without any problem (offcourse i mentioned in the visa application about my prior visa rejection).
hairstyles Volleyball players hot?
alisa
03-06 07:59 AM
^^^^
svr_76
03-20 01:29 AM
I think soon the time will come when legal immigrant on the path of becoming "permanent residents" (AOS) will stand side-by-side with the citizens and permanent residents in opposing temporary work-permits or non-permanent work visa (H1B) on which they themselves came; to save the job in US.
We might loose our local job to a person just like us who is here on a non-immigrant dual-intent work visa, sponsered by a IT out-sourcing firm (just as our past employers, or even current employers i might say). The new guy will first learn the trick of trade and then act as "Onsite Coordinator" and get the same stuff done from remote site...
We might loose our local job to a person just like us who is here on a non-immigrant dual-intent work visa, sponsered by a IT out-sourcing firm (just as our past employers, or even current employers i might say). The new guy will first learn the trick of trade and then act as "Onsite Coordinator" and get the same stuff done from remote site...
snathan
09-21 12:55 AM
What desi3933 said above seems to reverberate a lot whenever this question comes up. But I have not found an official statement/legislation number referenced by anyone yet. The limited time I spent trying to search for it did not yield anything.
Does anyone have the legislation?
What I do not understand is, when one is allowed to have two different H1s and be working for both the petitioning employers while maintaining each of them, why can't someone work a different job (using EAD for I9 form) while he/she still maintains their full time position with the H1 petitioning employer? As far as I know, the restriction on a H1 is that the beneficiary should use it to work for the petitioning employer only; that it can't be used for any other work.
I know a lot of attorneys also seem to say that "if you use EAD, you lose your H1".
And a lot of attorneys say that it is a grey area.
Are you sure one can work for more than one employer in H1. Assume that I am working for company A in full time and I have another H1 for company B. Now if I get any part time work like 10-12 hrs work per week for company B/B's client, Can I work without any issues? Is there any restriction for number of hrs or anything else...if you have any link please provide the source...
Thanks.
Does anyone have the legislation?
What I do not understand is, when one is allowed to have two different H1s and be working for both the petitioning employers while maintaining each of them, why can't someone work a different job (using EAD for I9 form) while he/she still maintains their full time position with the H1 petitioning employer? As far as I know, the restriction on a H1 is that the beneficiary should use it to work for the petitioning employer only; that it can't be used for any other work.
I know a lot of attorneys also seem to say that "if you use EAD, you lose your H1".
And a lot of attorneys say that it is a grey area.
Are you sure one can work for more than one employer in H1. Assume that I am working for company A in full time and I have another H1 for company B. Now if I get any part time work like 10-12 hrs work per week for company B/B's client, Can I work without any issues? Is there any restriction for number of hrs or anything else...if you have any link please provide the source...
Thanks.
0 comments:
Post a Comment