anandrajesh
12-03 08:10 PM
Add all the Pro Sportsperson playing in NFL, NBA, MLB & NHL
Wayne Gretzky, Canada
Samkan Gado, Nigeria
Johan Santana, Venezuela
Sammy Sosa, Virgin Islands
Andrei Kirilenko, Russia
Manu Ginobili, Argentina
Dirk Nowitzki, Germany
Steve Nash, Canada
Justin Moraneau, Canada
Vlade Divac, Slovakia
& the list goes on.....
Wayne Gretzky, Canada
Samkan Gado, Nigeria
Johan Santana, Venezuela
Sammy Sosa, Virgin Islands
Andrei Kirilenko, Russia
Manu Ginobili, Argentina
Dirk Nowitzki, Germany
Steve Nash, Canada
Justin Moraneau, Canada
Vlade Divac, Slovakia
& the list goes on.....
wallpaper mens hairstyles fat face
chunky
09-26 04:46 PM
Here is the updated list
Janisaris - I called last time this monday. I understand it it frustrating to call evertime. I think everyone should pick one day to call
chunky/I-140 - Pending at NSC/LUD-No/No CC/No Receipts/ Not entered in System per IO call on Sep 24/ Live in Texas area jurisdiction state
GC REK/ I-140 - aprooved from Texas/ LUD - ?/ No Receipts/ Not entered in System - ???/ Live in ?? area
gkommineni/ I-140 - Filed concurrently/ LUD - No/ No Receipts/ Not entered in System - ???/ Live in Nebraska area
Janisaris/ I-140 - June, 06 from Nebraska/ LUD - No/ No Receipts/ Not entered in System - IO called 2 days back/ Live in Nebraska area
vkaledho/ I-140 - ??/ LUD - ?/ No Receipts/ Not entered in System - ???/ Live in ?? area
Coold/ I-140 - ??/ LUD - ?/ Received FP notice from TSC/ Entered in System - Yes/ Live in ?? area
kkkking/ I-140 - ??/ LUD - ?/ No Receipts/ Not entered in System - ???/ Live in ?? area
Did anyone try calling in the past two days. I am so tired of hearing the same answer over and over again.
Janisaris - I called last time this monday. I understand it it frustrating to call evertime. I think everyone should pick one day to call
chunky/I-140 - Pending at NSC/LUD-No/No CC/No Receipts/ Not entered in System per IO call on Sep 24/ Live in Texas area jurisdiction state
GC REK/ I-140 - aprooved from Texas/ LUD - ?/ No Receipts/ Not entered in System - ???/ Live in ?? area
gkommineni/ I-140 - Filed concurrently/ LUD - No/ No Receipts/ Not entered in System - ???/ Live in Nebraska area
Janisaris/ I-140 - June, 06 from Nebraska/ LUD - No/ No Receipts/ Not entered in System - IO called 2 days back/ Live in Nebraska area
vkaledho/ I-140 - ??/ LUD - ?/ No Receipts/ Not entered in System - ???/ Live in ?? area
Coold/ I-140 - ??/ LUD - ?/ Received FP notice from TSC/ Entered in System - Yes/ Live in ?? area
kkkking/ I-140 - ??/ LUD - ?/ No Receipts/ Not entered in System - ???/ Live in ?? area
Did anyone try calling in the past two days. I am so tired of hearing the same answer over and over again.
ajju
04-25 10:22 PM
As part of Team IV I took ownership of organizing IV professional networking events and had some time carved out this weekend to put some thoughts together on how to do this. We already have a linkedin group for Immigration Voice and I have become a member of this already. I will be glad to work with you on this.
I think linkedIn is a good idea.. and as you said there's already IV group...
I just joined linkedIn few days back.. I think it would be a good resource for any one... to get lots of contacts by getting connected to IV group...
I think linkedIn is a good idea.. and as you said there's already IV group...
I just joined linkedIn few days back.. I think it would be a good resource for any one... to get lots of contacts by getting connected to IV group...
2011 Short Pixie Round face Haircut
gc_on_demand
05-27 02:58 PM
Below is website that shows how a bill becomes a law, it mentions all the stages that it follows, please read this below website.
http://www.votesmart.org/resource_govt101_02.php
I think we are at step 5 on B. Committee Action can we call those Full committe members to take some action. It says if they dont take action then it will die in committe.
http://www.votesmart.org/resource_govt101_02.php
I think we are at step 5 on B. Committee Action can we call those Full committe members to take some action. It says if they dont take action then it will die in committe.
more...
.jpg "hot hairstyles fat face.")
sparky_jones
03-17 03:32 PM
Wow..this is definitely a first. Is the employer who sponsored I-140 under investigation? Unless the I-140 is being revoked for fraud, I don't see the connection between the I-140 and the H1B client letter.
a.j.2048
02-09 01:04 PM
OP,
on the outset it might seem that SK needs to be retrogressed but there is a possibility that it does not need to be.
What if all the above 7% cases were approved in the final Q and there were no India/Chinese available to be approved? Can you prove this one way or the other? No you cannot and any one cannot.
DOS is on a slippery slope, if they retrogress SK In final Q, they run the risk of not using up visa numbers as I & C old 485's have NC or other issues. If they do not retrogress it might seem like a injustice to I & C. Ideally, ( I say ideally and not practically) DOS should retrogress SK as there should be demand from old I & C cases after the USCIS/FBI joint effort.
This issue was already discussed here. (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=20185&highlight=EB-2+current&page=29)
The crab analogy applies here partly. These problems are minute problems compared to the bigger problem of retrogression and lack of required visa numbers. Our focus and effort needs to be on them and not on these issues that are actually offshoots of those bigger issues.
EB-3 was unavailable during July/Aug/Sep 2008. It looks like the DOS was extremely pessimistic in setting dates for EB-3 India/China in June 2008 when EB-3 ROW was moved to Mar 2006 but EB-3 I/C were held to Nov 01/Mar 03. If this happens again this year, more of the EB-3 overflow will go to ROW/Mexico rather than older EB3-I/C cases.
on the outset it might seem that SK needs to be retrogressed but there is a possibility that it does not need to be.
What if all the above 7% cases were approved in the final Q and there were no India/Chinese available to be approved? Can you prove this one way or the other? No you cannot and any one cannot.
DOS is on a slippery slope, if they retrogress SK In final Q, they run the risk of not using up visa numbers as I & C old 485's have NC or other issues. If they do not retrogress it might seem like a injustice to I & C. Ideally, ( I say ideally and not practically) DOS should retrogress SK as there should be demand from old I & C cases after the USCIS/FBI joint effort.
This issue was already discussed here. (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=20185&highlight=EB-2+current&page=29)
The crab analogy applies here partly. These problems are minute problems compared to the bigger problem of retrogression and lack of required visa numbers. Our focus and effort needs to be on them and not on these issues that are actually offshoots of those bigger issues.
EB-3 was unavailable during July/Aug/Sep 2008. It looks like the DOS was extremely pessimistic in setting dates for EB-3 India/China in June 2008 when EB-3 ROW was moved to Mar 2006 but EB-3 I/C were held to Nov 01/Mar 03. If this happens again this year, more of the EB-3 overflow will go to ROW/Mexico rather than older EB3-I/C cases.
more...
vallabhu
05-06 02:46 PM
wow that's even worse, waiting from Feb 08!!. I was hoping that we might have some response when we go next time. if you are waiting since feb we might as well give up.
I requested the officer in the DMV office to call us if they get response from USICS and he was nice enough and agreed to, we were so fed up and thinking not to go back to DMV until he calls us hope fully he gets response before he retires (Officer looked to be aged person).
I am thinking that we should go to a different state and get the driving license.
I requested the officer in the DMV office to call us if they get response from USICS and he was nice enough and agreed to, we were so fed up and thinking not to go back to DMV until he calls us hope fully he gets response before he retires (Officer looked to be aged person).
I am thinking that we should go to a different state and get the driving license.
2010 Round Fat Face Hairstyles.
looivy
05-11 01:51 AM
Fool me once shame on you
Fool me twice shame on me
He will likely lose 2012 to Romney.
Fool me twice shame on me
He will likely lose 2012 to Romney.
more...
rheoretro
08-21 04:02 PM
Why does diversity make sense for family based GC's only? Do I sense some arrogance in the implication of that statement, which would be that employment-based immigrants are raceless and bereft of some ethnicity? Do they come from one nation only? I don't think so!
The fact of the matter is that employment-based immigration does affect the demographic landscape of the nation. This is a very funademntal idea that is lost on some people in this forum. True, in EB GC's, you are not given permanent residence as in FB or in diversity-based categories, but everyone comes with a certain race and ethnicity (yes, even skilled professionals!) - that's part of evryone's baggage!
Imposing country quotas on H1-B1 visas is not (definitely not!) a solution, and in fact it would wreak havoc of a must surreal kind. If people are hurting because of the retrogression now, they'll be hurting even more trying to find jobs, if this crazy measure were to be adopted.
As for F-1 visas, no school gives out admission to any program worth its salt merely using the nationality of the applicant as the deciding metric. Just like business, these are merit-based decisions. One gets a job ostensibly because one demonstrates the right skills, the appropriate background and the right aptitude for the job.
A short-term "solution" to retrogression is capture of unusued numbers and transferring them to over-subscribed categories. Also, spouses and family members should not be taking up precious numbers of EB applicants.
Long-term solution: I have a feeling that no durable long-term solution will emerge untill after the dust settles from the elections this fall.
The fact of the matter is that employment-based immigration does affect the demographic landscape of the nation. This is a very funademntal idea that is lost on some people in this forum. True, in EB GC's, you are not given permanent residence as in FB or in diversity-based categories, but everyone comes with a certain race and ethnicity (yes, even skilled professionals!) - that's part of evryone's baggage!
Imposing country quotas on H1-B1 visas is not (definitely not!) a solution, and in fact it would wreak havoc of a must surreal kind. If people are hurting because of the retrogression now, they'll be hurting even more trying to find jobs, if this crazy measure were to be adopted.
As for F-1 visas, no school gives out admission to any program worth its salt merely using the nationality of the applicant as the deciding metric. Just like business, these are merit-based decisions. One gets a job ostensibly because one demonstrates the right skills, the appropriate background and the right aptitude for the job.
A short-term "solution" to retrogression is capture of unusued numbers and transferring them to over-subscribed categories. Also, spouses and family members should not be taking up precious numbers of EB applicants.
Long-term solution: I have a feeling that no durable long-term solution will emerge untill after the dust settles from the elections this fall.
hair short hairstyles fat face
nashim
01-15 11:32 AM
I agree with desi3933
more...
svn
03-31 01:47 PM
OK, as gcisadawg mentioned, this is a piece of a puzzle but we now have multiple sources of information. So, let's try to put some of those together to arrive at Current Pending 485 Applications by category:
1st source of Information:
In the information just released by USCIS, they have given us us a "goal" they had set for themselves for year end i.e. Sep 30, 2009. However, as per their tracking, they are nowhere near achieving this goal since they have a HUGE backlog as of today. Using the information provided
Current Pending 485 Applications = Total Open 485 Applications Goal at end of Sep, 2009 (i.e. 301,695) + Total of Current Backlog based on current rate (i.e. 370,888)+ Applications that correspond to the "Normal" rate of processing between now and Sep 30 2009 (?)
= 672,583 + ?
2nd Source of Information:
At the end of Jan 2009, USCIS had released number of I-485 applications pending = 620,249
The two sources of information indicate that the number of pending I-485 applications has actually gone up by at least by 52,334. This seems strange given that most folks have not been able to file I-485s recently given unavailability of visa numbers. However, if you exclude the number of I-131 i,.e Advance Parole applications(56,328) that have been included as part of I-485 in 1st Source of Information, that leads us to the number of applications that USCIS has in fact processed between end Jan 2009 and today (drumrolls please) =
3994
So, if in about 7 weeks between end Jan 2009 and Mar 23, 2009 (date of release of Memo), USCIS has processed 3994 applications, we can anticipate that in the 27 weeks between now and end of Sep, 2009, USCIS, the number of applications it will process is:
15405
In other wods, given their current rate of processing and their current backlog, by the end of Sep 30, 2009, the number of pending applications will still be
= 672,583 - 56,328- 15,405
= 600,849
Hate to be gloomy but ....Hope, anyone?
1st source of Information:
In the information just released by USCIS, they have given us us a "goal" they had set for themselves for year end i.e. Sep 30, 2009. However, as per their tracking, they are nowhere near achieving this goal since they have a HUGE backlog as of today. Using the information provided
Current Pending 485 Applications = Total Open 485 Applications Goal at end of Sep, 2009 (i.e. 301,695) + Total of Current Backlog based on current rate (i.e. 370,888)+ Applications that correspond to the "Normal" rate of processing between now and Sep 30 2009 (?)
= 672,583 + ?
2nd Source of Information:
At the end of Jan 2009, USCIS had released number of I-485 applications pending = 620,249
The two sources of information indicate that the number of pending I-485 applications has actually gone up by at least by 52,334. This seems strange given that most folks have not been able to file I-485s recently given unavailability of visa numbers. However, if you exclude the number of I-131 i,.e Advance Parole applications(56,328) that have been included as part of I-485 in 1st Source of Information, that leads us to the number of applications that USCIS has in fact processed between end Jan 2009 and today (drumrolls please) =
3994
So, if in about 7 weeks between end Jan 2009 and Mar 23, 2009 (date of release of Memo), USCIS has processed 3994 applications, we can anticipate that in the 27 weeks between now and end of Sep, 2009, USCIS, the number of applications it will process is:
15405
In other wods, given their current rate of processing and their current backlog, by the end of Sep 30, 2009, the number of pending applications will still be
= 672,583 - 56,328- 15,405
= 600,849
Hate to be gloomy but ....Hope, anyone?
hot hot hairstyles fat face.
number30
11-05 11:25 PM
What is Cross Chargeability?
When a Green Card applicant is subject to a quota waiting list, but is the child or the spouse of persons born in a country with more favorable quota, the applicant may cross charge to the most favorable quota.
My child is born in USA, can I cross charge to USA?.......What is US Priority date?::):):):)
Only spouse is considered for Cross Chargeability.
When a Green Card applicant is subject to a quota waiting list, but is the child or the spouse of persons born in a country with more favorable quota, the applicant may cross charge to the most favorable quota.
My child is born in USA, can I cross charge to USA?.......What is US Priority date?::):):):)
Only spouse is considered for Cross Chargeability.
more...
house short hairstyles round face.
catch22
02-27 01:12 PM
No amount of increase in visa numbers / Not counting spouses of Employment based applicants is of any use to Indian/Chinese/Philiphines legal immigrants.
Reason - Specter's proposed bill not only caps the per country limit at 10%, but also strikes down an entire key paragraph (see below) in the INA. Sec 202 that was inserted due to AC21 act.
(5) 2/ RULES FOR EMPLOYMENT-BASED IMMIGRANTS-
(A) EMPLOYMENT-BASED IMMIGRANTS NOT SUBJECT TO PER COUNTRY LIMITATION IF ADDITIONAL VISAS AVAILABLE- If the total number of visas available under paragraph (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) of section 203(b) for a calendar quarter exceeds the number of qualified immigrants who may otherwise be issued such visas, the visas made available under that paragraph shall be issued without regard to the numerical limitation under paragraph (2) of this subsection during the remainder of the calendar quarter.
(B) LIMITING FALL ACROSS FOR CERTAIN COUNTRIES SUBJECT TO SUBSECTION (e)- In the case of a foreign state or dependent area to which subsection (e) applies, if the total number of visas issued under section 203(b) exceeds the maximum number of visas that may be made available to immigrants of the state or area under section 203(b)consistent with subsection (e) (determined without regard to this paragraph),in applying subsection (e) all visas shall be deemed to have been required for the classes of aliens specified in section 203(b).
If the above provisions are struck, visas will not rollover from other countries to China/India/Philiphines (The Usual Suspects for retrogression) in the last quarter.
Reason - Specter's proposed bill not only caps the per country limit at 10%, but also strikes down an entire key paragraph (see below) in the INA. Sec 202 that was inserted due to AC21 act.
(5) 2/ RULES FOR EMPLOYMENT-BASED IMMIGRANTS-
(A) EMPLOYMENT-BASED IMMIGRANTS NOT SUBJECT TO PER COUNTRY LIMITATION IF ADDITIONAL VISAS AVAILABLE- If the total number of visas available under paragraph (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) of section 203(b) for a calendar quarter exceeds the number of qualified immigrants who may otherwise be issued such visas, the visas made available under that paragraph shall be issued without regard to the numerical limitation under paragraph (2) of this subsection during the remainder of the calendar quarter.
(B) LIMITING FALL ACROSS FOR CERTAIN COUNTRIES SUBJECT TO SUBSECTION (e)- In the case of a foreign state or dependent area to which subsection (e) applies, if the total number of visas issued under section 203(b) exceeds the maximum number of visas that may be made available to immigrants of the state or area under section 203(b)consistent with subsection (e) (determined without regard to this paragraph),in applying subsection (e) all visas shall be deemed to have been required for the classes of aliens specified in section 203(b).
If the above provisions are struck, visas will not rollover from other countries to China/India/Philiphines (The Usual Suspects for retrogression) in the last quarter.
tattoo Long Face Hairstyles,
new_horizon
10-13 04:24 PM
these one-time contributions are good. But I suggest the members should be encouraged to make regular monthly contributions, even as low as $25 a month. It's doable...just the cost of dining out with your family one time. that way the activities of IV can be planned much in advance, and it would lessen the anxiety of iv core.
just a suggestion, it might help the folks to contribute monthly if some of the activities are highlighted by core, so that the folks know how their monies are used. I know there are some issues to it, but a general info would help.
just a suggestion, it might help the folks to contribute monthly if some of the activities are highlighted by core, so that the folks know how their monies are used. I know there are some issues to it, but a general info would help.
more...
pictures Oval face shapes are the ones
jungalee43
03-04 11:11 AM
If the RFE is about I-140 revoked or withdrawn by your former employer:-
EVL: - Must state your date of joining, your job title and description, your annual salary and MOST IMPORTANTLY prospects for future employment.
Last two years tax returns, last two pay stubs and covering letter from attorney invoking AC21 and explaining in detail how you meet the criteria. Attach copy of 2003 Yates memo for guidelines on AC21.
If you need good attorney, send me PM.
Good luck.
ski_dude12, shana04, roseball, copsmart and ram04
Thank you all for responding to my query. Here is the more info regarding my case:
1) I switched to another company on EAD.
2) I worked for GC sponsoring company for over 2.5 years after filing I-485.
3) My current job title and responsibilities are almost same as earlier one.
Today I got a text message from USCIS with an RFE. I am still waiting for the letter in the mail.
Now:
1) What are all the documentation I need from my new (Current) employer apart from Employment Verification letter (EVL)?
2) Can i continue to work for the current employer while my case is in suspended state?
3) Can someone please provide me the EVL format?
Thanks in advance.
EVL: - Must state your date of joining, your job title and description, your annual salary and MOST IMPORTANTLY prospects for future employment.
Last two years tax returns, last two pay stubs and covering letter from attorney invoking AC21 and explaining in detail how you meet the criteria. Attach copy of 2003 Yates memo for guidelines on AC21.
If you need good attorney, send me PM.
Good luck.
ski_dude12, shana04, roseball, copsmart and ram04
Thank you all for responding to my query. Here is the more info regarding my case:
1) I switched to another company on EAD.
2) I worked for GC sponsoring company for over 2.5 years after filing I-485.
3) My current job title and responsibilities are almost same as earlier one.
Today I got a text message from USCIS with an RFE. I am still waiting for the letter in the mail.
Now:
1) What are all the documentation I need from my new (Current) employer apart from Employment Verification letter (EVL)?
2) Can i continue to work for the current employer while my case is in suspended state?
3) Can someone please provide me the EVL format?
Thanks in advance.
dresses quot;fat face hair stylesquot;,
shanti
12-01 01:19 PM
Ok so let's say, will the lame duck session be over by christmas? if yes, then I know we will know in a couple of weeks, I cannot believe that there are no dates for a session to finish.
more...
makeup Short Hairstyles For Fat Face
smuggymba
10-19 04:52 PM
.................and ronhira and simple1 have done their job for the day. Kudos.
Just click on simple1's profile and see how many troll alerts he issues. He himself is a troll of third grade.
These are simple PERM related confusion people have. Is raising a troll alert your aim in ur lowlife:):D
Troll Alert.
Just click on simple1's profile and see how many troll alerts he issues. He himself is a troll of third grade.
These are simple PERM related confusion people have. Is raising a troll alert your aim in ur lowlife:):D
Troll Alert.
girlfriend round fat face hairstyles.
seeking_GC
09-14 03:56 PM
Hello,
Well the Secure Fence Act was introduced and passed in the House, the SKIL bill is still in limbo.
My question is simple- what is our action plan for getting our provisions in and helping the bills move along?
I am a firm believer in IV and I believe that they are working behind the scenes to get our goals in.I have raised this point before too and am raising it again, a periodic update / affirmation without revealing too much details is all we are looking for.
Also, we have quite a few members now, dont we think we can accomplish more by energizing and ensuring all the members actively do some work to reduce the burden on the core team?
What is the approach that QGA is suggesting we follow? Is the secure fence act a feasible option to introduce our goals in? (Maybe as a Senate ammendment) Since both House and Senate will have to pass it (to look strong in front of the election going public), maybe we can use that to our advantage.These are my thoughts and maybe I am wrong but let us not let opportunities like these go waste, lets investigate and work on all avenues which seem likely.
Again, let me stress I do not wish to cast any doubts on the skills/hardwork that the core team is doing but if we believe our strength lies in using the entire teams efforts then lets start doing that and stop relying only on the core team.
Well the Secure Fence Act was introduced and passed in the House, the SKIL bill is still in limbo.
My question is simple- what is our action plan for getting our provisions in and helping the bills move along?
I am a firm believer in IV and I believe that they are working behind the scenes to get our goals in.I have raised this point before too and am raising it again, a periodic update / affirmation without revealing too much details is all we are looking for.
Also, we have quite a few members now, dont we think we can accomplish more by energizing and ensuring all the members actively do some work to reduce the burden on the core team?
What is the approach that QGA is suggesting we follow? Is the secure fence act a feasible option to introduce our goals in? (Maybe as a Senate ammendment) Since both House and Senate will have to pass it (to look strong in front of the election going public), maybe we can use that to our advantage.These are my thoughts and maybe I am wrong but let us not let opportunities like these go waste, lets investigate and work on all avenues which seem likely.
Again, let me stress I do not wish to cast any doubts on the skills/hardwork that the core team is doing but if we believe our strength lies in using the entire teams efforts then lets start doing that and stop relying only on the core team.
hairstyles short hairstyles fat women
rayoflight
04-15 03:21 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Excellent Point Roseball.
Prasad please review this with an attorney before you make a decision.
Assuming your stamping is successful, the only other issue I would see is the validity of your new I-94 at the POE in Toronto (US immigration check is done at toronto airport)...Since your new H1 approval only starts after the current one expires, historically I have seen cases where the IO at POE only gave the I-94 for the duration of the current H1 and not until the validity of the new approved H1. The reason given was that the new H1 was not valid on the date of entry even though its approved and he cannot allow a person to stay based on a document which is valid in future. But the cases I came across were when the new H1 start date was more than 3 or 4 months away. In your case since the start date is only 1 month away this "may or may not" be an issue....I think USCIS allows people to enter US 3 weeks in advance or something like that..I am not sure of the exact time interval but I think you can find out online....If they only give you an I-94 till the validity of your current H1, then you either will have to travel and re-enter again after your new H1 starts or apply for an extension again.....Just wanted to give you a heads up on the possibility of this issue...Good luck with your stamping....
Prasad please review this with an attorney before you make a decision.
Assuming your stamping is successful, the only other issue I would see is the validity of your new I-94 at the POE in Toronto (US immigration check is done at toronto airport)...Since your new H1 approval only starts after the current one expires, historically I have seen cases where the IO at POE only gave the I-94 for the duration of the current H1 and not until the validity of the new approved H1. The reason given was that the new H1 was not valid on the date of entry even though its approved and he cannot allow a person to stay based on a document which is valid in future. But the cases I came across were when the new H1 start date was more than 3 or 4 months away. In your case since the start date is only 1 month away this "may or may not" be an issue....I think USCIS allows people to enter US 3 weeks in advance or something like that..I am not sure of the exact time interval but I think you can find out online....If they only give you an I-94 till the validity of your current H1, then you either will have to travel and re-enter again after your new H1 starts or apply for an extension again.....Just wanted to give you a heads up on the possibility of this issue...Good luck with your stamping....
saketkapur
02-12 06:02 PM
I am a legal immigrant living and working in OC in the high tech industry. My household income is more than $100K. I want to buy a home and invest but due to the immigration mess my green card application is stuck in the backlog for maybe 4-6 years.Let me stress again: "I am a legal immigrant." There are hundreds of thousands like me who want to invest in the US. Its not that I am new here , I have worked and lived in US for 7 years now.Anyways as long as the legal immingration reform will be held hostage by the anti immigrants who like to muddy the lines between legal and illegal immigrnats to further their own nativist agenda I guess people like me who live by the rules and follow the rule of the land will land up being the ultimate scapegoats and nothing is going to change. Also the media does not care because 12 million(illegals) is a much better sound byte than law abiding tax paying couple 100 thousand(legals)!!! :mad:
hopefulgc
08-08 04:01 PM
An antithetical incarnation of the popular "lighten up" thread
Damn straight... this is where y'all can come bitch about how it sucks to be in AOS.
and guess what .. some loser gave me a red for starting this thread.
--- Here we go ---------
You have followed the law.
You have filed all the documents they asked for.
You have paid astronomical fees for someone to just look at your documents and state the obvious (i.e. You deserve PR)
This is Year 2... f**king thousand ....8.. the information tech age for crying out loud.
And everywhere I hear... almost everyone is in dark about what is going on.
"We have a lot of case load... You are going to need to wait"
I am thinking of starting a website where people can enter their email address and just get fake "card production ordered" emails.
That way, at least the impatience and novelty associated with getting approved will wear off and we can go back to pretending we are in a developed country.
Damn straight... this is where y'all can come bitch about how it sucks to be in AOS.
and guess what .. some loser gave me a red for starting this thread.
--- Here we go ---------
You have followed the law.
You have filed all the documents they asked for.
You have paid astronomical fees for someone to just look at your documents and state the obvious (i.e. You deserve PR)
This is Year 2... f**king thousand ....8.. the information tech age for crying out loud.
And everywhere I hear... almost everyone is in dark about what is going on.
"We have a lot of case load... You are going to need to wait"
I am thinking of starting a website where people can enter their email address and just get fake "card production ordered" emails.
That way, at least the impatience and novelty associated with getting approved will wear off and we can go back to pretending we are in a developed country.
0 comments:
Post a Comment